Contact
The Rejekihubgames.com editorial desk handles all incoming requests related to corrections, metadata accuracy, content feedback, and review quality. Send your message directly to [email protected]. All messages are reviewed by the editorial team and processed according to the type of request submitted.
If you have identified an error in a review — whether in the written analysis, the displayed rating, the associated artwork title, or any section heading — submit a correction request. Include the full URL of the affected page, the exact text currently shown, your proposed revision, and a brief explanation of why the change is warranted. Clear, specific requests are processed first.
General feedback about review quality, analysis depth, or editorial tone is welcome. If a particular section consistently feels thin, or if a scoring criterion appears to be applied inconsistently across the archive, let the team know. Feedback that references specific pages and quotes the relevant text is significantly more actionable than general impressions.
Metadata requests cover page titles, meta descriptions, canonical URLs, alt text on images, and structured data fields. If you believe a page's metadata does not accurately reflect its content, or conflicts with other indexed pages, submit the page URL, the metadata field in question, and your recommended replacement. Schema errors should include the JSON-LD field name where possible.
To suggest a work for inclusion in the review archive, describe the title, its visual genre, and the reason it merits a full structured review. Suggestions are evaluated against the existing archive to ensure coverage adds genuine comparative value. Works already heavily covered by other critical sources may be deprioritized in favor of under-reviewed visual styles.
The editorial team reviews incoming messages within two business days. Correction requests for factual errors are prioritized and typically resolved within one business day of confirmation. Review suggestions and general feedback may take longer depending on editorial scheduling. You will receive a response confirming receipt and the expected resolution timeline.
Once a request is received, the editorial team evaluates it against the current page content and the site's publishing standards. If a correction is validated, the relevant page is updated and the change is logged internally. If a suggestion is accepted, it enters the review queue. All requests — accepted or declined — receive a direct reply. Declined requests include a brief explanation.
Before You Write
Following these guidelines helps the editorial team process your request quickly and accurately.
Always include the direct URL of the page your request concerns. Vague references to "a review about X" slow down processing. Copy the full URL from your browser address bar and paste it into your message as the first line.
When submitting a correction, quote the exact sentence or phrase that contains the error. Do not paraphrase. Exact text allows the team to locate the passage immediately and compare it against your proposed replacement without ambiguity.
If you have corrections for multiple pages, send a separate message for each page. Bundled requests covering several different URLs are harder to process accurately and may result in some items being missed or delayed.
When emailing, begin your subject line with the request type: Correction, Metadata, Suggestion, or Feedback. This routes your message to the correct review queue immediately and prevents delays from manual sorting.
